Why is Chrysler still selling new 2006 Crossfires?

Discussion in 'Chrysler Parts For Sale / Trade' started by Mister Bear, Aug 9, 2007.

  1. Mister Bear

    Mister Bear Guest

    I still see dealers advertising NEW 2006 Crossfire coupes and roadsters!
    Does anyone know why? Mister B
     
    Mister Bear, Aug 9, 2007
    #1
  2. Mister Bear

    Art Guest

    What do you expect them to do with unsold inventory. Bury them?
     
    Art, Aug 9, 2007
    #2
  3. Mister Bear

    Jalapeno Guest

    They aren't NEW anymore but marketing them as UNSOLD or NEW FROM OLD
    STOCK may be just as good as burying them :eek:)

    Perhaps they should have the dealers drive them around the block a few
    times and sell them as EXTREMELY LOW MILEAGE used cars :eek:)
     
    Jalapeno, Aug 9, 2007
    #3
  4. Mister Bear

    TNKev Guest


    if they have never been owned they are "new"


    but marketing them as UNSOLD or NEW FROM OLD
     
    TNKev, Aug 9, 2007
    #4
  5. It's tempting: small town Ohio here.....an indendent (but reputable)
    used car dealer has a used '06 Coupe.........3300 miles, balance of
    warranty.....very pretty car in medium metalic blue. Asking $19,000.
    Now, that's depreciation!

    I guess the thing that stops me is the thought of what those Benz parts
    will cost in the future.
     
    Itsfrom Click, Aug 9, 2007
    #5
  6. Mister Bear

    kmath50 Guest

    I understand there are several dealers around the nation that have
    unsold Crossfires. I think that they are stuck with them, as Chrysler
    probably won't take them back for either cash or credit.

    -KM
     
    kmath50, Aug 9, 2007
    #6
  7. Mister Bear

    Nza Guest

    It should stop you indeed. Nevermind if it is physically the same as
    any other type of Benz motor or other parts.. since it is for
    Crossfire, it will be *RIDICULOUSLY* expensive. I used to work on
    mercedes-benz junk and it pissed me off every time i tried to use
    something as simple as an inside door handle from a parts car in
    another car with a different chassis model and found it to be just
    slightly different enough so as to not be useful without looking
    extremely ghetto. Either that, or it just didn't work. Not like
    the old days of MoPar where everything had the same window crank, door
    handles, voltage regulator, alternator, etc.
     
    Nza, Aug 9, 2007
    #7
  8. Circa 1960?

    DAS

    For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Aug 9, 2007
    #8
  9. Mister Bear

    Steve Guest

    Because no one BOUGHT them.
     
    Steve, Aug 10, 2007
    #9
  10. Mister Bear

    Steve Guest

    I'd worry less about the Benz parts (the drivetrain is shared with a lot
    of other Benz cars) as the Crossfire-specific body and interior parts....
     
    Steve, Aug 10, 2007
    #10
  11. Mister Bear

    Steve Guest


    The amount of interchangability among Chrysler cars from about 1960-61
    right through the 80s is amazing. There was an almost 20-year run there
    where the technology continued to advance and the cars got more advanced
    sub-systems, but interchangeability wasn't disrupted. Its great for us
    Mopar collectors now, because we can back-fit all sorts of things so
    easily. Disk brakes for a '66 Polara? Get a set of disk-brake steering
    knuckles off a '73 Newport at a junkyard, the combination valve off ANY
    post-71 Mopar, and buy the rest at NAPA (pads, rotors, calipers, etc
    are all still in-stock most of the time). The whole conversion costs
    under $200, compared to over a grand for an aftermarket custom brake system.

    Even the 80s front-drive cars (sucky as they were) shared a lot of basic
    mechanical components during the K-car era.
     
    Steve, Aug 10, 2007
    #11
  12. Mister Bear

    who Guest

    I expect Chrysler wrote them off last year, included in the 150,000 cars
    that were unsold and written off, giving Chrysler that huge loss. >:)
    So as far as Chrysler is concerned they are gone, gone forever!
     
    who, Aug 11, 2007
    #12
  13. Mister Bear

    maxpower Guest

    I would guess because they still have them on the lot!!!

    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Aug 11, 2007
    #13
  14. Mister Bear

    philthy Guest

    the car ss a blast to drive if you are a driver and the car really sucks
    in the snow you will get stuck real easy
     
    philthy, Aug 12, 2007
    #14
  15. On ThursdayI posted about a nice Crossfire couple at a local dealer
    (with 3000 miles for $19,000).....it's been sold and driving around town
    with plates on it now.

    Today (Sunday) the same dealer now has a convert....but it's $23,000.

    This is an independent dealer with about 40 cars on its small
    lot.......and said to go to Detrot mfg's auctions to get real executive
    cars. Looks like the word is out to get rid or the Crossfires.......and
    our little town of 20,000 may end-up as the Crossfire Capital of
    Ohio!!!!
     
    Itsfrom Click, Aug 12, 2007
    #15
  16. Mister Bear

    who Guest

    Of course it's a toy, but it does seem to be a steal.
     
    who, Aug 13, 2007
    #16
  17. Mister Bear

    Mister Bear Guest

    I suppose I set myself up for wisecrack comebacks when I asked WHY new
    2006 Crossfires are still at dealerships. I have never run into a
    similar situation before. The question is why haven't 2 year old new
    2006 Crossfires sold? Bad car? Too expensive? Supply problem? When
    new cars remain unsold this long, there's has to be a story behind it.

    In contrast, the new Saturn Sky has generally had a waiting list for
    availability. A new '08 Sky at full list price can be had way cheaper
    than most new 2006 Crossfires sold at deep 5-figure discounts. This is
    just plain strange.

    Mister B
     
    Mister Bear, Aug 13, 2007
    #17
  18. Mister Bear

    Steve Guest


    They built too many for the demand. Its styling is extreme enough to
    have very limited appeal, and combined with a potentially tempermental
    and expensive to maintain Mercedes drivetrain, and it lacked enough
    performance to be attractive except for the turbo version (which was
    even MORE expensive). The Prowler had even more extreme styling, but was
    more attractive, had more base performance, and did it with a very
    simple and dead-nuts reliable Chrysler drivetrain borrowed from the LH
    cars. More importantly, they did a better job of predicting the Prowler
    demand and didn't build so many of them.
     
    Steve, Aug 13, 2007
    #18
  19. Mister Bear

    philthy Guest

    it's a small german 2 seater car that was way overpriced for what it is
    trying to be sold in a american market that did not want it and did i
    mention it sucks in the snow
     
    philthy, Aug 14, 2007
    #19
  20. Mister Bear

    Vaughn Guest

    2006 overall was bad because of over production for DC. I still see brand
    new 06 300's and a few brand new Chargers being sold at dealerships.
    The 07 production is much less. Used 06's will take a huge depreciation
    because of this.
     
    Vaughn, Aug 14, 2007
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.