Valvoline ATF+4

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Lou G, Sep 7, 2006.

  1. Lou G

    Lou G Guest

    Has anyone in the group tried this over the counter trans fluid? It
    states it meets Chrysler's spec 9602. I also saw it at Walfart in the
    Super tech brand labeled ATF+4. Results?

    Lou G
     
    Lou G, Sep 7, 2006
    #1
  2. Lou G

    DeserTBoB Guest

    If Ashland brands it ATF+4, then it has to meet the MoPar spec, I'd
    think. However, I'd never buy anything from Wally-Fart, regardless of
    pricing advantage.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 7, 2006
    #2
  3. Lou G

    Coasty Guest

    My wife works a Wally World and the ATF+4 is made by Valvoline (as much of
    the Wally World Oil is) which you can buy at any auto parts store now.
    Since Chrysler has to license and approve the ATF and MFGs have to the QA
    standard before it can be sold I would guess it is ok.
    Coasty
     
    Coasty, Sep 7, 2006
    #3
  4. Lou G

    Bill Putney Guest

    'Guess' is the key word there. It depends on a several things: How
    tightly the ATF+4 specs. are written; Are there two (or more) sets of
    specs. - one for Mopar and Valvoline labeled product and one for third
    party labeled product (this is often the case in the modern
    manufacturing world)?; I assume MBA's run Valvoline, and therefore all
    bets are off about a spec. and quality controls meaning anything
    especially for a third-party label product.

    I realize any product carrying the ATF+4 label is supposedly made to
    some spec. (the public would automatically assume that, and MBA's would
    take advantage of that), so the following analogy is not perfect, but
    assuming that the SuperTech ATF+4 is indistinguishable from Mopar or
    Valvoline branded ATF+4 is almost like saying "Infinity makes great
    speakers. My 300M came from the factory with Infinity speakers,
    therefore, my 300M has great speakers". IMO, it's a gamble to assume
    that it is the same product with no technical compromises. Another
    example is the "Genuine" GM, Chrysler, Ford parts gimmick used on the
    public for dealer-purcahsed parts. Many dealer parts sold under the
    "Genuine..." label are made to an entirely different (degraded) spec.
    OEM manufacturers have a network of people they call when they have
    quality issues on the production line that they call to unload the
    substandard product for aftermarket - including dealer - parts at a
    reduced price.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Sep 7, 2006
    #4
  5. Lou G

    Lou G Guest


    Good point Bill. I happened to be in Wally world today and they had 4
    qts.of mopar +4 on the shelf at $4.42 qt. so I picked them up. I also
    learned as you stated they are not created equal. The ST brand +4
    stated meets mopar specs #7176 which is old specs for +3 and older
    versions as far as I know. The mopar brand is #9602 which is only for
    +4. The Valvoline +4 I spotted in AA was also speced at #9602, so I
    recon that would be ok. My feeling now is with the trans being such a
    costly item the mopar fluid is still the best deal after doing the
    research. By the way the Valvoline was more expensive at $4.68 qt.

    Thanks to all you folks that replied.

    Lou G
     
    Lou G, Sep 7, 2006
    #5
  6. Lou G

    Bill Putney Guest

    Ooh - I wouldn't have thought they'd have made that so obvious. Those
    MBA's are slipping! The WalMart brand did not mention 9602 spec.?

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Sep 8, 2006
    #6

  7. What's wrong with Walmart ? If they have the same item for 20% less,
    that's good for the consumer, not bad.
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 8, 2006
    #7
  8. Lou G

    Lou G Guest


    Nope! ST was labeled ATF+4 but back read meets chrysler spec #7176
    replaces ATF+ 2,3,4. No mention of #9602.

    Lou G
     
    Lou G, Sep 8, 2006
    #8
  9. Lou G

    FeMaster Guest

    Unless it's your business that they put out of business by doing that, which
    means you've just lost your job... Is that good for you as a consumer?
     
    FeMaster, Sep 8, 2006
    #9
  10. Lou G

    DeserTBoB Guest

    If the consumer's an idiot, yes. If he has at least half a brain and
    can use it, then no. You can also blame this "Wally-Fart" effect for
    the mass closures of thousands of independent and regional auto parts
    houses and jobbers, with the onset of low-buck, lower-quality national
    chains like Poop Boys and AutoBone.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 11, 2006
    #10

  11. Wrong- Walmart just buys in a large volume from the same companies, and
    can mark the product down more. They aren't putting anyone out of a
    job- unless you like being raped by a ma/pa store for 2x the price on
    the same goods.
     
    duty-honor-country, Sep 11, 2006
    #11
  12. Lou G

    aarcuda69062 Guest

    Wrong. Walmart dictates the price point where they want a
    particular product to be sold at, the manufacturer is then left
    to engineer the product to meet that price point. The result is
    more often than not, something that appears to be the same as
    what is being sold by their competitors, but is in fact, much
    less durable inside and often, not serviceable like the
    competitions product.
    IOWs, do NOT expect that Mr. Coffee coffeemaker to last anywhere
    near as long as the one you could have bought elsewhere.

    People that buy from Walmart are stupid, they don't understand
    value, only price and are ignorant to what their actions do to
    increasing landfill requirements (that's trash).
     
    aarcuda69062, Sep 11, 2006
    #12
  13. Lou G

    DeserTBoB Guest

    A simpleton's view of economics, for certain. Wally-Fart beats their
    suppliers over the head to chop thier own costs, meddling in thier
    financial affairs (even moreso than Sears, Roebuck did for years to
    theirs) and generally promotes a "drive to the bottom" approach to
    handling retail. Their abuses of employees is the stuff of labor
    legend, and the millions in fines paid to both state and Federal labor
    boards is fact. Adled-brained simpletons like Noodles only look at
    the impact on their meager income (now truncated by the collapse of
    his eBay fraud empire) and cannot fathom a larger view.

    True Wally-Fart story: Barstow, CA, a longtime railroad division
    point and shop town, was a single source economy generally fueled by
    economic acitivities of the AT&SF Railway and the Union Pacific.
    Later, things diversified as the US Army opened Fort Irwin, the Navy
    opened the Marine Supply Depot in Yermo and Yellow Truck Lines built a
    large hub and intermodal terminal near the rail yards in town in the
    '70s. To serve the local economy, K-Mart built one of their signature
    stores there in the 1970s.

    The Army relegated Fort Irwin to a training base with little permanent
    staff, the Marine Corp deactivated Yermo, thus making Barstow a single
    economy town again...based solely on transportation and whatever
    burgers could be sold to travelers on I-15 heading to and from Las
    Vegas. Then, BNSF, successor to the Santa Fe, announced that, after a
    125 year presence in that town, the shops and yard at Barstow would be
    closed and a new intermodal terminal in concert with Yellow would be
    built in their former large yard in San Bernardino. Both BNSF and
    Yellow closed their Barstow yards at the same time, plunging the area
    into 40% unemployment. Despite this dismal economic scene, Wal-Mart
    then announced they were opening a store in town. Local merchants, as
    well as K-Mart, launched a now-common "anti-Wal-Mart" drive to keep
    them out, but Wal-Mart, in typical fashion, greased the local
    politicos and got their permit to build and operate.

    The store opened, and Wal-Mart immediately went into predatory pricing
    mode, beating even K-Mart by some 20% on common items, obviously
    selling product at a loss in many cases. K-Mart, then in bankruptcy,
    folded their Barstow operation, as Wal-Mart had decimated their floor
    traffic, knowing that 40% of the town was on some form of pubilc
    assistance and every penny counted. The day after K-Mart closed, ALL
    prices at Wal-Mart soared 25-30% and even more. It bears mentioning
    that, during the Wal-Mart/K-Mart price war, almost ALL the local
    retailers along Business 15 closed their doors. Now, Barstow has
    effectively ONE retailer...Wal-Mart...and they control the market at
    their pleasure, something that would've drawn indictments a scant 20
    years ago.

    Wal-Mart recently announced they're going to build a new store in
    another small railroad town nearby, Tehachapi. However, the
    reinvigorated K-Mart/Sears combination has stated that they will run
    Wal-Mart into the ground, no matter how long it takes, matching and
    beating them on pricing point until they are either gone or engage in
    "reasonable competition." The locals are already forming
    "anti-Wal-Mart" groups and are holding the local politicos feet to the
    fire about campaign contributions and other graft. K-Mart employees,
    already near the bottom of the US hourly wage scale, have better
    benefits and wage progression with Sears/K-Mart, and already know what
    Wal-Mart will mean...labor law violations, lower wages, and NO
    benefits, Wal-Mart's multi-million dollar advertising and PR hype to
    the contrary.

    Bear in mind that back in the '80s, AT&T tried to compete with pesky,
    flim-flammish MCI by meeting them on long distance toll rates, and
    were prevented from doing so by regulators. Why doesn't this case law
    apply to Wal-Mart? Answer: political "grease."

    Wal-Mart is anti-competitive. Wal-Mart is driving American wages
    lower, a fact borne out by the DoL's own figures, showing hourly wages
    in the US being 8% lower on average than in 2000. Wal-Mart has a long
    record of civil legal violations. Friends don't let friends shop at
    Wal-Mart...period.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 11, 2006
    #13
  14. Lou G

    DeserTBoB Guest

    'Cuda's hit it on the nail. Look at Murray, the lawn mower maker.
    Wal-Mart Murray products are NOT the same as those sold by them
    elsewhere. I have a neighbor who learned the hard way that any
    product sold by Wal-Mart not only will not perform to the standard of
    the same manufacturer's product sold at better retailers, but that
    Wal-Mart will try in earnest to "hose off" any warranty claims or
    customer complaints. The local small engine/lawn equipment shop here
    in town verified this just the other week for me...a "Wal-Mart Murray"
    is NOT the standard Murray product, and is designed to fail due to
    "decontenting" from their standard models. The parts listings aren't
    even the same; self-propelled MTD mowers from Wal-Mart use cheap
    plastic drive gears that do NOT come on their product sold
    elsewhere...only Wal-Mart.
    Again true. Chinese Mr. Coffees bought there are "built to fail."
    Since no one fixes anything anymore, they expect the toad buyers to
    simply throw it in the trash and return for another one. I bought a
    Bunn coffee maker....15 years ago...and have never, except for
    descaling the boiler tube, had any failure of any kind. That's
    quality, something you do NOT get from Wal-Mart.
    Exactly right.
     
    DeserTBoB, Sep 11, 2006
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.