US car dealers turn away Canadian new-car buyers - is that legal?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by MoPar Man, Sep 28, 2007.

  1. MoPar Man

    MoPar Man Guest

    Such rules do not prohibit or hinder a transaction between a
    prospective Canadian customer and a US new car dealer.
    The Canadian gov't publishes guides explaining how it's citizens can
    import a wide variety of items from the US into Canada. The Canadian
    gov't does not have the same level of "paranoia" regarding the
    tracking or reporting of the movements of assets owned by Canadians
    outside of Canada (or inside for that matter). The only requirement
    along those lines is that Canadians must report if they own more than
    $100k of non-Canadian real estate. Many Canadians own US real estate,
    and vice-versa.
    Are there state or local laws that prevent US car dealers from selling
    NEW vehicles to Canadians?

    The sale of USED vehicles to Canadians happens all the time. So do US
    state or local laws differentiate between new and used vehicles - or
    (as I suspect) are there NO such state or local rules prohibiting sale
    based on Canadian residency?
    That is a technicallity that is NOT used as the basis for denial of
    sale of NEW vehicles to Canadians.
    The franchise agreements can not contain illegal clauses that
    constitute restraint of trade. If they do, they can (and should) be
    challenged by the dealers.
     
    MoPar Man, Oct 13, 2007
    #41
  2. MoPar Man

    MoPar Man Guest

    The US new car dealer IS NOT SELLING INTO CANADA.

    The US new car dealer is selling to a Canadian resident. The US
    dealer is not authorized to collect Canadian taxes. The Canadian
    customer must show proof to the relavent Provincial department of
    Transportation that applicable provincial sales taxes were paid before
    the vehicle can be licensed for operation on public motorways. Such
    taxes are uaually paid at the boarder when the vehicle is brought into
    Canada.
    The Canadian federal gov't and the various Provincial gov'ts do not
    prohibit the importation of vehicles (new or used) by Canadian
    citizens from the US into Canada, and they do not employ restrictive
    or onnerous tactics to prevent the lawful registration and use of
    those vehicles in Canada. To the contrary, the Canadian gov'ts
    publish guides explaining how to perform such importation and
    registration.

    The US and relavent State gov'ts have no rules or mechanisms in place
    to prevent or hinder the sale of new or used cars to Canadians by US
    dealers.

    Hence this is not an issue of trade policy or trade law between
    countries.

    This is a restraint-of-trade issue which makes such clauses in
    franchise agreements illegal if not unenforcible.
     
    MoPar Man, Oct 13, 2007
    #42
  3. MoPar Man

    info Guest

    It's like most the people responding to your question didn't read your
    question.... strange.. it must frustrate you.

    To answer your question; it's illegal for the dealerships not to sell
    you a car on the basis of your race - that violates the civil rights
    you can enjoy while in the jurisdiction of the states. (You do not
    have to be a US citizen but instead just be in the states to have
    rights.) Having a policy not to sell to Canadians is no different as
    having a policy not to sell to Jews or Blacks. When I say Jews or
    Blacks, people can automatically see the point more clearly.

    The agreement between the manufacture and the dealership is mute and
    has no merit. Your problem is NOT with the manufacture but instead the
    dealership that is breaking the law and pulling the trigger so to
    speak. Of course, the franchise agreement is illegal however that's
    not for you to dispute but the dealership. You must make your claim
    against the dealership.

    3 main points to prove in a discrimination complaint / law suit:

    1. Is the discrimination intentional = yes, the dealership/manufacture
    state it's their policies NOT to sell to Canadians that are in their
    stores and buying their products within the USA. This isn't an export
    issue or tax issue (there is procedures already in place for both of
    those issues so they are mute.)

    2. Motive = their motive is profit: their policy is to protect their
    dealerships on both sides of the border.

    3. To prove that this policy exists. This is usually the hardest to
    prove. You can always scream discrimination however who in the world
    is going to admit it? Well, the dealerships will every time.

    You'd think with the 1, 2, 3 covered people would line up and take the
    dealerships to court. The problem is, people are don't understand they
    have the right to and they are lazy and assume the worst.
     
    info, Oct 16, 2007
    #43
  4. MoPar Man

    Bill Putney Guest

    Canuk is not a race. Race is a protected class. Nationality is not a
    protected class.
    No - it clearly does not.
    Yes it is (though your *conclusion* on restraint of trade may be right,
    but not for the reason you cite).
    Your conclusions may be right, but for the wrong reasons - civil rights
    (as defined by U.S. federal law) is not the issue. Races and religions
    are protected classes (civil rights as defined by federal law).
    Nationality (i.e., being Canadian) is not a protected class.
    (Currently, protected classes are race, color, sex, creed, and age.)

    Like I said, you may or may not be right that trade restrictions across
    borders are illegal, but if it is illegal, it would not be illegal for
    the same reason that not selling to blacks or to jews would be illegal.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Oct 16, 2007
    #44
  5. Mute? You mean they told the dealer to keep quiet about it?
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Oct 16, 2007
    #45
  6. MoPar Man

    Ken Moiarty Guest

     
    Ken Moiarty, Oct 16, 2007
    #46
  7. MoPar Man

    Bill Putney Guest

    LOL!

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Oct 16, 2007
    #47
  8. MoPar Man

    Ken Moiarty Guest

    So far I've contacted two U.S. Honda dealers for price quotes. Neither one
    would give me a quote. The first one gave me a bullshit line about needing
    me to provide a Washington address so they could charge the 8.5% state sales
    tax, which would then take them four weeks to process. When I wrote back
    telling them I'd done my research and that their Washington sales tax story
    just didn't wash with me, they replied, "I am sorry Honda is trying to make
    it so difficult for Canadians to purchase down here." The second dealer
    just ignored my request for a quote altogether.

    Ken
     
    Ken Moiarty, Oct 16, 2007
    #48
  9. It's what car companies tried in the (then) European Community, and it's
    been cracked down upon.

    When in 1986 I bought a Mercedes in Germany to bring to Britain and save
    cash the unofficial barrier was a ridiculously long delivery lead time.
    Outright refusal to sell was illegal, of course. Interestingly, I received
    a letter announcing the car would be ready three months early and graciously
    inviting me to come and collect.

    This restriction was possible since I couldn't just buy a car off the
    dealership floor or from the 2nd-hand market because I wanted RHD, and there
    are no such cars in stock in Germany.

    Six years ago, when I did it again, there was no such restriction,
    fortunately. Saved a few thousand quid. Less than anticipated since in the
    time to delivery the UK price was lowered (in the face of a rising tide of
    personal imports) and the German price raised (esp for RHD vehicles).

    DAS

    For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Oct 16, 2007
    #49
  10. MoPar Man

    80 Knight Guest

    I saw on the news the other day (Toronto Ontario news) that Honda is one of
    the companies who won't sell cars in the US to Canadian's. They didn't say
    anything about law's, only that most people don't have any problems other
    then with Honda.
     
    80 Knight, Oct 17, 2007
    #50
  11. There are many reasons why a car maker doesn't want a new car sold
    in one country to immediately be taken to and registered in a
    different country. The only way to know for sure is to get through to
    a 'High Muckety Muck' (VP or higher) at the car maker and ask - and
    that's if you can get a straight answer from them, they can always say
    "That's the way it is, Go away and stop bothering me..."

    Could be import quotas, or export quotas, or missing required
    equipment like DRL's used to be before they made them fleet-wide, or
    that the computers will balk sending a USA spec car's warranty and
    recall notices to a Canadian address...

    Could be as simple as the Canadian car dealers insisting that if
    they have to service them they should get the commissions from selling
    them. And that's a valid complaint.

    Another valid one it could well be is warranty concerns - since part
    of the sales price is you've "paid" for your pro-rata share of the
    warranty costs for that model year into the USA warranty pool. But
    the Canadian warranty costs pool didn't get contributed to when you
    bought the car in the USA, so if your car needs any warranty work the
    Canadian distributor is going to take a loss on it on their books.

    A few USA Residents having problems while driving through visiting
    Canada wouldn't be a big problem - they probably have a way to "hand
    clear" small quantities of the costs between the different divisions.
    But if they have a big recall and have 100,000+ "unpaid" repairs to do
    on "Grey Market" cars, that will hurt bad.

    --<< Bruce >>--
     
    Bruce L. Bergman, Oct 17, 2007
    #51
  12. MoPar Man

    MoPar Man Guest

    No, there aren't many reasons. When Canadians are sitting on their
    hands waiting for prices in Canada to drop because of the increased
    value of the Canadian dollar, then that is not good for the
    manufacturers either.

    It is widely known by Canadians for the past few months (if not the
    past year or two) that retailers of MANY items are not cutting retail
    prices to reflect the price reductions they have been seeing at the
    wholesale and importer level. We should be seeing DEFLATION in
    Canada, but we're not.
    You are a moron. I have stated MANY times in this thread that US new
    car DEALERS have nothing to do with importation or exportation or any
    mythical quotas. When a Canadian walks into a US new car dealership
    and wants to buy a new car, that car is not deemed to be exported from
    the USA any more than a bag of frozen food is deemed to be exported
    from the USA if that Canadian had gone to a grocery store and bought
    that frozen food and brought it back to Canada.

    Truth is that the US gov't doesn't (and really has no way) to measure,
    track, or record the stuff that Canadians buy at retail and then bring
    back into Canada. A car is just another retail item.

    And when that Canadian brings his hypothetical new car from the US
    into Canada, again the US dealership is not involved AT ALL in that
    transaction, and the idea or concept of quotas are also not involved.
    It is up to the Canadian who brings the car into Canada to make sure
    it meets all regulatory requirements - not the US dealer who sold him
    the car.
    Pure speculation - and besides, when you're looking at saving between
    $5k and $20, do you really care about future recall notices? And also
    not a reason for the US dealer to deny the sale.
    That is an issue that's down the road, and plays no role in the
    initial decision for the US car dealer to refuse to do business with
    the Canadian customer. The US dealer doesn't know, and really can't
    know, and really doesn't care, if a Canadian dealership will perform
    any service or waranty work on the car.

    Where have you ever bought a car where the dealer wants some assurance
    that you will bring the car back to them for servicing - or they won't
    sell you the car? What utter bullshit.
    And that's a bullshit complaint. I can buy a car at dealer A and get
    it serviced at dealer B, and dealer B doesn't complain that he didn't
    get the commission from selling me the car in the first place.
    Again, a US dealer can tell the Canadian customer that he might have a
    problem with warranty work, but that's for the Canadian customer to
    risk or deal with, not the US dealer. That doesn't prevent the US
    dealer from selling to the Canadian customer at all.
     
    MoPar Man, Oct 17, 2007
    #52
  13. MoPar Man

    cavedweller Guest

    This isn't a response to you, MoPar Man, but yours was the last post I
    read so thought I would attach the following link here for the benefit
    of others who may be interested.

    http://www.riv.ca/
     
    cavedweller, Oct 17, 2007
    #53
  14. We really had a nice conversation going here until you came along and ruined
    it with FACTS.
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Oct 18, 2007
    #54
  15. MoPar Man

    MoPar Man Guest

    I've always been saying that there are fundamentally no blocks in
    place by the CDN gov't when it comes to importing cars into Canada,
    and have said that there are plenty of instructions on the net for
    doing so.

    The one item that's interesting is the requirement on the US side to
    fill out paperwork informing them of any motorized (self-propelled)
    vehicles being exported from the country. There doesn't seem to be
    any fee or cost for that, but there also doesn't seem to be any teeth
    to it either. The various forms and proceedures that are done for the
    car in Canada probably don't require any proof that the US export
    registration was in fact performed - and if the car crosses back into
    the USA during routine use, US customs probably would never know the
    car was improperly exported from the USA.

    The Canadian import proceedures don't really seem to anticipate that
    the car being imported from the US into Canada is a NEW car. One
    example is that a declaration that the car has no outstanding recall
    issues is part of what's required. A brand new car presumably would
    not leave a dealer's lot with an unresolved or uncorrected recall
    issue.

    Interesting that Canadian Tire is prominently mentioned as a place
    that a car can be taken to for the inspection and certification of
    conformity with Canadian DOT rules.

    See also:

    http://www.importcartocanada.info/

    http://autosportint.com/quick_quote.html

    http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070919/Car_deals_070919?s_name=&no_ads=

    http://www.ucanimport.com/

    http://www.apa.ca/template.asp?DocID=253

    -------------------
    The name of the Case which states that Canadian dealers must do
    warranty work on U.S. cars is:

    Toyota Canada Inc. v. Lipetz, 1998 CanLII 4473 (BC S.C.)

    I recommend anyone purchasing a car print off this case to know what
    Canadian Dealers are OBLIGATED to do under warranty
    --------------------
     
    MoPar Man, Oct 18, 2007
    #55
  16. MoPar Man

    Rob Guest

    No, you need to keep quiet about the fact that Canadians are not a
    protected class!
     
    Rob, Oct 18, 2007
    #56
  17. MoPar Man

    Mike Marlow Guest

    I keep seeing these wild numbers thrown about and I have to admit to a
    certain confusion. There's a bit gap between 5K and 20K. Surely you have
    something more specific to relate these numbers to. Obviously, you are
    talking across a whole range of cars. Care to expound a bit?
     
    Mike Marlow, Oct 18, 2007
    #57
  18. MoPar Man

    Josh S Guest

    Makes sense.
    An independent cross Canada maintenance facility.

    OK for tire and battery changes, go elsewhere for anything else.
     
    Josh S, Oct 18, 2007
    #58
  19. Could be but it isn't that.

    The Canadian dealers don't want to lose the sales to the US dealers.
    So they complained to the factory who then told the US dealers to not
    sell to Canadians. Which is a violation of NAFTA. A couple years
    back when the exchange rate was the opposite way, US dealers
    had no problems selling to Canadians. It has nothing to do with the
    rest of the BS your spouting.

    The motorcycle groups have been discussing this same topic, BTW.
    Both Honda and Harley are making it difficult for Canadians to buy
    in the US. However, people who have actually done it report that
    if they get a cashiers check for their opening offer and fill their pockets
    with Gypsy Travelers Checks ($100 bills) and walk into a US dealer,
    the sight of the ready cash melts away the objections and they buy
    their car or bike.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 18, 2007
    #59
  20. MoPar Man

    Ken Moiarty Guest

    Where have you been? Instances of where a savings of around $20,000+ can be
    realized are *hard not to find*. Nonetheless, here's an example to get you
    started:

    Canada: 2008 Lincoln Navigator base MRSP (incl. $1250
    dlvry.) ------------------------- * $74,649 CAD

    United States: 2008 Lincoln Navigator base MRSP (incl. $900
    lvry.) -------------------- * $48,655 USD

    You do the math.


    Ken


    * Sources:
    http://ford.ca/main/default.asp?language=en&section=2&source=&sVehCategory=Lincoln&model=Navigator
    and
    http://www.lincoln.com/configurator/BuildAndPriceModel.aspx,
    respectively.
     
    Ken Moiarty, Oct 18, 2007
    #60
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.