Modern Tires Ruin the Roads

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Nomen Nescio, Nov 26, 2005.

  1. Nomen Nescio

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Yep, the freeze/thaw is the big killer, but salt isn't great for
    concrete either.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 26, 2005
    #21
  2. Hello, Coasty!
    You wrote on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:20:52 -0500:

    C> May be they should start building roads out of recycled rubber from
    C> tires, then the roads could throw the stones back in retaliation.

    C> --
    C> Coasty
    C> Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
    C> ??>> Pebbles catch in the fine sipes of modern tires and are carried in the
    ??>> tread. As the tire rolls, they abrade the roadways.
    ??>>
    ??>> Earlier tire designs use coarse zig-zag treads that cannot pick up
    ??>> small rocks. Car manufacturers should specify tire tread designs that
    ??>> do no degrade the roads. Only rubber compound should contact the
    ??>> roadways.
    I seem to recall a project in Ontario a few years ago where some
    experimental sections of road were laid with mixtures of asphalt with
    granulated tires and/or sulphur. I guess it was not successful because I
    have not heard any more about it.

    Cheers

    Indrek Aavisto.
     
    Indrek Aavisto, Nov 26, 2005
    #22
  3. Nomen Nescio

    dold Guest

    Please don't feed the trolls.
    Notice that the "non specific person" has not participated in these lengthy
    posts other than to kick them off.

    There are 3650 posts this month from NN this month alone.

    A proper observation:
    "I believe that our recent experience with "Nomen Nescio" was an attempt to
    waste our time with unreasonably argumentative rants that started ..."
     
    dold, Nov 26, 2005
    #23
  4. Nomen Nescio

    joe schmoe Guest

    The Freeze / Thaw issue is only so when water penetrates the surface.
    Salt is only an issue where it facilitates the melting of snow into
    openings in the surface. Smooth, thick concrete will easily last
    20+ years.
     
    joe schmoe, Nov 26, 2005
    #24
  5. Nomen Nescio

    joe schmoe Guest

    I don't wonder, I know it becomes particulate matter we all get to
    breath, free of charge. Excepting of course the rubber that is
    "burnt" into the streets in front of schools.
     
    joe schmoe, Nov 26, 2005
    #25
  6. Oh yeah? You calling me a liar?

    "In my area there was a 750 foot portion of concrete built to interstate
    standards that lay dormant for 25 years... blocked off, it had no
    vehicular traffic, and negligible salt on it.
    It only had rain and freeze/thaw.


    By the time the roadway got extended, it was a broken up mess.. they had
    to tear it all up and lay new concrete."
     
    Backyard Mechanic, Nov 26, 2005
    #26

  7. ;) <<<<
     
    Backyard Mechanic, Nov 26, 2005
    #27
  8. Nomen Nescio

    Matt Whiting Guest

    It is water under the concrete that causes the biggest problem when it
    freezes. If the subgrade preparation and drainage isn't good, the
    entire slab will heave causing cracks over time.

    Surface damage can and does occur from the very small shrinkage cracks
    that exist in virtually all concrete and these are susceptible to salt
    and water damage over time. Yes, good concrete will last 20 years, but
    I've seen concrete that didn't last 10. And even 20 years is pretty
    expensive now that concrete costs several million dollars per mile of
    four-lane highway.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 26, 2005
    #28
  9. Nomen Nescio

    WaterWatcher Guest

    Perhaps it was due to tire resistance, but I doubt it. IMHO it was due to
    the poor road constuction back then. Modern roads are much more heavily
    built than they were in the bias ply days, at least where I live. Nowadays
    cities near here gut the old road and lay in much more base rock and asphalt
    than they took out. Compaction and testing methods have also greatly
    improved, as have materials. So, if you want to take the opinion of a
    person who deals with road reconstruction on a peripheral basis, the tires
    may not have had much to do with it. More important than the tires is the
    amount of traffic, and how heavy the vehicles are, when it comes to roadway
    wear.

    WW (almost a geezer, depending on what the definition of THAT is!)
     
    WaterWatcher, Nov 27, 2005
    #29
  10. Nomen Nescio

    Joe Pfeiffer Guest

    I'm completely mystified. How obvious a troll does dear Nomen has to
    post before people will get the message and NOT RESPOND?
     
    Joe Pfeiffer, Nov 27, 2005
    #30
  11. Nomen Nescio

    Grayfox Guest

    --
    Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
    Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
    New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer
    skype: jjpfeifferjr

    Joe, Nomen is clearly a troll, but we also must question whether you are
    an imposter. Surely someone with a Ph.D. in any discipline would be able
    to post two sentences without a grammatical error. Were you really
    someone with a Ph.D., I know that you would have said, "How obvious a
    troll does dear Nomen have (not "has") to post before people will get
    the message and NOT RESPOND?"

    Sign Me

    Just Checking
     
    Grayfox, Nov 27, 2005
    #31
  12. Nomen Nescio

    Guest Guest

    The secret is SMOOTH. As in WAY too smooth to provide adequate
    traction for safe highway driving. A textured concrete surface WILL
    deteriorate from freeze-thaw, and WILL end up with salt embeded in the
    concrete. Up here in the "great white north" the vast majority of
    highway surfaces are asphalt of one type or other. VERY little exposed
    concrete.
    The salt used on the roads has severely damaged MANY re-enforced
    concrete structures- like bridges bu corroding the encapsulated
    re-bar, and splitting the concrete.
     
    Guest, Nov 27, 2005
    #32
  13. Nomen Nescio

    Guest Guest

    I wouldn't say it wasn't successful - the testing continues. A few
    more years will start to tell the tale.
     
    Guest, Nov 27, 2005
    #33
  14. Nomen Nescio

    Hairy Guest

    No, the geezer is correct in his tire resistance theory. But it has nothing
    to do with bias ply vs. radial ply. A vehicle moving in a straight line
    wants to continue in a straight line, even while turning. Thankfully, there
    is usually enough tire resistance to overcome this tendency. The curves in a
    gravel road take extra load because of it.

    More important than the tires is the
    Absolutely.

    Dave
     
    Hairy, Nov 27, 2005
    #34
  15. The surface of concrete is absorbant, if you have oil drips on the surface
    of the smoothest concrete they will stain. The places that the oil goes is
    where the water goes, and freeze thaw will soon etch and destroy the smooth
    surface.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Nov 27, 2005
    #35
  16. Nomen Nescio

    joe schmoe Guest

    Not sure if I'm supposed to be upset and start a flame war. Too tired
    though.

    I was tending to think of concrete sidewalks that are stamped 1940
    with no cracks...

    But then again they aren't built to interstate standards. They're
    built better :)
     
    joe schmoe, Nov 27, 2005
    #36
  17. Nomen Nescio

    joe schmoe Guest

    Your sig line explains it all.

    you can't understand b/c it's rooted in human nature.

    Post secondary education is about knowing more and more about less and
    less.

    PS this isn't a flame, just an observation
     
    joe schmoe, Nov 27, 2005
    #37
  18. I don't think his PhD is in English or Eng. Lit.

    I work in a machinery field infested with engineering types and I can tell
    you that knowledge of grammar and spelling is abysmal on both sides of the
    Atlantic.

    Similar applies to scientists, many educated to degree or postgraduate
    level. It is kwite apawling.

    DAS

    For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Nov 27, 2005
    #38
  19. What I found surprising to learn just a few years ago was how little
    international exchange there was on the question of road surfacing
    materials. You'd think that companies would take the best practice and
    experience on a global basis and apply that. But they don't or, at least,
    didn't. Everybody was ploughing his own little furrow, so to speak.

    I happened to sit next to someone on an airport shuttle bus who was on the
    way to (one of?) the first international conferences in this field. And it
    was being held in Iceland (hohoho!) to be on 'neutral' territory...

    DAS

    For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Nov 27, 2005
    #39
  20. Nomen Nescio

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Sidewalks tend to get a lot less salt that roads. And sidewalks tend to
    have fairly small blocks that can heave with the ground and not break.
    Most interstates concrete sections are at least 20' square and most are
    even larger. It is hard to heave such a large piece evenly enough to
    avoid large stresses in the concrete. Then you drive heavy trucks
    across them while they are heaved and bad things happen.

    Probably!


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 27, 2005
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.