Merc R-Class: Pacifica by another rname?

Pacifica by another rname?


http://www.viamichelin.com/viamichelin/gbr/tpl/mag4/art20050901/htm/route_mercedes-classe-R.htm


Discuss.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

 

I don't think there are many (if any) shared components between the
two. From what I've seen, it appears that the engine is mounted
longitudinally in the Benz (IOW, it's a RWD with a transfer case
providing power the the front), as opposed to the Pacifica which is
primarily FWD.

Sure, they look similar, but that seems to be the trend these days.
It's the station-wagon-meets-SUV syndrome. I think other makers will
be following suit soon, if not already.

Regards,
Joe

 

Just as ugly, but no, it's not a Pacifica.

 

Funny thing is that the R-class concept vehicle appeared at the same
Detroit Auto Show as the production Pacifica, allegedly without the
Chrysler Group people knowing it even existed. Kind of like the DBenz
people hurried something along so they would not look "behind" or
something.

The two vehicles are totally independent of each other, yet in the same
general classification. I suspect the DBenz people needed something to
"save face"?

Also kind of funny that the 3.5L DBenz V-6 in the Crossfire has
basically the same power as the first gen Chrysler 3.5L V-6. In the
displays, the DBenz engine looks really neat and expensive, but doesn't
make a whole lot more power than the orig Chrysler 3.5L V-6. So much
for looking neat and being made by DBenz.

Just some thoughts . . .

C-BODY

 

But is it quieter? The 3.5 from Chrysler makes a racket.

 

Nothing mechanical in common with the Pacifica. Looks more like a bigger
version of a Scion XA than a Pacifica (which is to say its fugly). It is
the same "market segment" I guess.

But overall, I would say "no."

 

Not if its working right.... I think the Chrysler 3.5 is one of the
better-sounding v6s out there (though all v6 engines sound pretty poor
compared to a v8).