Engine Oil/Additives for high mileage 3.0

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by jmcgill, Nov 29, 2005.

  1. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    If you go with Purolator, go with the Pure One - costs a couple of
    dollars more but is better than the base Purolator model, and no
    gimmicks like you get with some of the $8 and $10 filters.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 1, 2005
    #21
  2. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    There was a comment that synthetics have a lot o detergent additives in
    them. Actually it's not the additives - synthetic is inherently much
    more aggressive in its detergent properties without additives.

    I agree that buying a commercail blend is a bad choice - you have no
    idea what you're getting/paying for (what percentage the blend is).
    *IF* you want a blend simply make your own by using, say, 1 or 2 qts.
    dino with 4 or 3 qts. synthetic. And because of the high detergent
    properties of synthetic, at high mileage, you should switch over
    gradually - like use 4 qts. dino to 1 qt. synth, then change at 1000
    miles (with new filter) to 3 qts. dino to 2 qts. synth, repeat at an
    additional 1000 to change interval (i.e. 2000 miles at second change)
    and increasing the proportion of synth., changing filter each time,
    until you're at the proportions you want to stay with (all the way to
    100% if that's what you decide).

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 1, 2005
    #22
  3. jmcgill

    Steve Guest


    I used to think that this question was just too dumb to ask anyone
    without mortally insulting their intelligence. Then one day I was at a
    gas station filling up, and the driver next to me was doing underhood
    checks on a Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.2L. I was idly watching and not paying
    much attention, until I saw the driver carefully go through this procedure:

    -pull out the ENGINE OIL dipstick (yes, I could see that it wasnt' the
    transmission dipstick),
    -wipe it down without looking at it,
    -walk around and START the engine,
    -re-insert the stick, pull it out,
    -gaze deeply at the smear of oil all up and down the length of the stick
    for a few seconds,
    -put the stick back in,
    -close the hood, and drive away.

    I know 5.2's are indestructible, but I sure felt sorry for that one. And
    it sure lowered my assessment of the minimum knowledge that most drivers
    have about their cars :-(
     
    Steve, Dec 1, 2005
    #23
  4. jmcgill

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Steve,

    This is just one more sad testament to failure in the driver education
    program. Basic things such as safety and fluid level checks should be
    ingrained into any new driver and tested before they are granted the
    privilege to drive by the respective state.

    Why didn't you attempt to educate this apparently ignorant individual. To
    me, the fact that he attempted to check the oil level appears to be a good
    sign that he would have been "teachable". Checking the oil while getting
    gasoline is something you rarely see done any more.

    By the way, this incident reminds me of the time I asked my then nearly
    16-year old son (and who had just completed driver's education) to start the
    family vehicle for me. It was cold outside and the vehicle was garaged. He
    did as asked and then came back into the house to warm up. About 3 or so
    minutes later I went out to hop into the car only to discover the garage
    door was still down and the car was running. When I asked him why he did
    not raise the door he said he thought the car would warm up faster if the
    door was down ... This was a teachable moment and he learned the dangers of
    engine exhaust. I was just flabbergasted that he said that they never
    covered this topic in the driver's education course which cost us several
    hundred dollars for him to take.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Dec 1, 2005
    #24
  5. jmcgill

    Steve Guest

    100% honest answer- I was just too shocked. I realized what I should've
    done about the time they drove off.
     
    Steve, Dec 1, 2005
    #25
  6. You're going to have to support that assertion with hard facts.
    Aw, come on. You're making it up as you go along.

    I've switched many high-miles engines to synth, all at once, without any
    problems.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 1, 2005
    #26
  7. True enough, but the plain Purolator is a perfectly fine filter.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 1, 2005
    #27
  8. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    Probably the lawyers warned the school not to teach the kids that
    because if any kid committed suicide by CO poisoning in a garage, the
    parents would have probably successfully sued the school for a few
    million for "suggesting"/introducing the idea to them.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 1, 2005
    #28
  9. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    I claim it's a risk and you were lucky. You might say that my opposite
    observations were coincidental with problems/damage that was already in
    progress/inevitable/not related to the sudden changeover. I would
    retort (after you torted) that I was able to reverse the valve clatter
    (that occurred the one time I did a switchover on a high mileage car of
    mine) by acting on my suspicions, which would not have been successful
    had my suspicions been wrong.

    Basically we are both basing our beliefs on our personal experience - my
    personal experience is no more scientific than yours, and vice-versa.
    Your observation is no less anecdotal than mine. And we could both find
    "experts" to back up our respective claims. Nanny nanny boo boo. :)

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 1, 2005
    #29
  10. Based on...?
    Once? Maybe.
    Twice? Possibly.
    Thrice? Perhaps.
    *TWELVE* times?!! Don't think so.
    I know you are, but what am I? I'm telling!
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 2, 2005
    #30
  11. jmcgill

    VaVoom Guest

    There is one gimmick - the red teflon coating on the rubber gasket. I
    don't like the stuff, it can rub off with a rag leaving red clumpy deposits.
     
    VaVoom, Dec 2, 2005
    #31
  12. jmcgill

    Guest Guest

    I've used Duralube with great success on several cars over many years.
    Better mileage, less wear, quieter engine.
     
    Guest, Dec 2, 2005
    #32
  13. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    I already told mom about it. And also - you know that thing you did to
    the cat 2 years ago that I promised never to tell her about - I told her
    that last year. Hah!

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 2, 2005
    #33
  14. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    I've noticed that touted on the label, but I've never seen it clump -
    maybe you just shouldn't rub it with a rag ("Doc - my finger hurts when
    I do this." "Well quit doing that!"). :) In fact I just thought the
    rubber itslef was red and the that coating was a light dusting that I
    couldn't see. Oh well. I just ignore it and put a light coating of oil
    on it anyway. Call it a gimmick, but the Teflon™ may prevent the
    gasket-stuck-to-the-block problem that can occur if the mechanic is not
    paying attention causing potential loss of an engine/lawsuit against
    filter mfgr., etc.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 2, 2005
    #34
  15. jmcgill

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I haven't switched many, but I have switched a couple - likewise always
    with good results.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Dec 2, 2005
    #35
  16. jmcgill

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I'd say you were just unlucky. :)

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Dec 2, 2005
    #36
  17. jmcgill

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Yes, as have many people who have gained 20% fuel economy by using a
    vortex generator in their intake system. It is amazing what the human
    mind will believe when it wants to. However, whenever a real test is
    done in cases like this, the results are almost always neutral or negative.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Dec 2, 2005
    #37
  18. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 2, 2005
    #38
  19. You've got me dead to rights. Would you like to shoot me now, or wait til
    we get home?
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 2, 2005
    #39
  20. True. And either of our procedures is far safer than dumping in Doctor
    MoJo's Miracle Motor Cream with Flex Fluoride and Gunkion Microparticulate
    Flash Fluid (DuraLube, Slick-50, Motor-Up, Restore, etc. etc. etc.)
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Dec 2, 2005
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.