DC licensing ATF+4 for aftermarket

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Bill Putney, Aug 16, 2005.

  1. Bill Putney

    Bill Putney Guest

    Bill Putney, Aug 16, 2005
    #1
  2. Bill Putney

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Thanks for posting. I do hope the price comes down. Also note that ATF+3
    is being phased out and that all vehicles, even older ones that were
    designed for ATF+3, will use the +4 formulation. I've already been doing
    that and have not seen any problems, even in our 1999 T&C minivan.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Aug 16, 2005
    #2
  3. Bill Putney

    Richard Guest

    I recently purchases some +4 at the dealer and the price there has already
    come down a bit from last year.

    Richard.
     
    Richard, Aug 16, 2005
    #3
  4. Ted Mittelstaedt, Aug 17, 2005
    #4
  5. Bill Putney

    Greg Houston Guest

    I doubt the ATF+4 price slide will accelerate much anytime soon.
    Remember D-C is doing this amist anti-trust pressure to the federal
    government. (See ILMA's letter to the FTC
    http://ilma.org/resources/ftc_dcc_letter.pdf) D-C also has legitimate
    reasons to be really careful with the quality and formulation of ATF+4
    in addition to wanting to be the supplier. Their newer transmissions
    are very sensitive to ATF properties so quality control has to be very
    good. So you can bet that the costs of manufacturing ATF+4 should be
    higher for the new producers (licensing, quality control checks,
    periodic D-C inspections) than it would be for generic ATF fluids.
     
    Greg Houston, Aug 18, 2005
    #5
  6. It's not the cost of manufacture that is the problem. Raw crude is selling
    at about $1.20 a gallon. I would guess after refining and blending with
    the additives, the trans fluid is probably selling at under $8 a gallon.

    Now, how do you get from $2 a quart to the $8 quart that it seems to
    be selling through the dealer network?

    That is the real problem. Standard retail markup is 400% and ATF+4
    isn't available outside of a dealership, so a trans shop that uses a lot of
    it in customer transmissions has to buy it by the case from the chrysler
    dealer. They can't go to whoever they buy bulk motor oil from and
    get it from them. Nor can you or I go to a discount auto parts place
    that has a lower markup, and buy it from them. Nor can you or I
    wait until a regional or national auto parts place puts it on sale.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Aug 18, 2005
    #6
  7. Bill Putney

    Bill Putney Guest

    A couple of points:

    (1) It is not selling for $8 a quart. I just called my local dealer,
    who is not known for discounting and in fact typically charges full
    list, and they told me they are presently charging $4.40/qt. That's
    cheaper than the around $5.20/qt. they were charging 2 years ago (I had
    read on the forums that the price had dropped a little over the last
    year or two, so that is consistent with my local dealer). As a point of
    reference, whenever we have discussed (on R.A.M.C.) the wide variation
    of dealer pricing of ATF+4 a year or two ago, the worst price I ever
    remember seeing posted was $7 - maybe $8 - but that doesn't reflect the
    current non-competitive (i.e., non-aftermarket available) pricing. If
    everything is linearly scalable, I would say worst-case
    gouge-me-'til-it-hurts dealer pricing should be around $6.35/qt now.

    (2) ATF+4 is supposedly a semi-synthetic. I'm not sure I know much
    about what that means, but since synthetic motor oil costs a bit more
    than non-synth, I assume there are some real additional processing costs
    to "create" a synthetic or semi-synthetic (again - whatever that means).
    Point being that synth motor oil being 4 to 6 times the price of
    non-synth, I would think you have to scale your pricing of semi-synth
    ATF+4 a bit higher relative to the price of raw crude (to refelct the
    retail price of semi-synth relative to non-synth).

    With it going aftermarket, the price should drop - which maybe was your
    main point (which wasn't clear to me after I had finished reading your
    post).
     
    Bill Putney, Aug 18, 2005
    #7
  8. The main point I was trying to make is that the bulk of the cost of
    each quart is added to the quart by the distribution chain. The
    dealer parts department is about the most expensive auto parts
    distribution chain there is - and for good reason, the dealer parts
    distribution chain must warehouse the most obscure and little-used
    part in the car - and as such it's generally a terrible place to buy
    a commodity item like a fluid.

    Compare Walmart's distribution chain with Mopar. What the consumer
    benefits the most by - which is the entire point of the anti-trust laws
    by the way - is to have consumable commodities like gasoline, motor
    oil, grease and transmission fluid that everyone needs to buy, to be
    available for sale through the Walmart's of the world and their distribution
    chains.
    (while trans fluid isn't normally consumed, since it has to be changed
    periodically, you do consume it over the life of the vehicle)

    When that happens, those places represent sufficient threat of competition
    that the expensive distribution chains either have to lower their prices
    to keep the same volume, or just accept the loss of revenue.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Aug 19, 2005
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.