Lloyd said:
Would you settle for more than an Audi TT?
Coupe has several engine options, which include 180 hp/auto/FWD, 225
hp/manual/AWD, and 250 hp/?/AWD. Zero-to-60 for these cars range from
6.3 to 7.9 seconds. Roadster has same engine options as Coupe.
Zero-to-60 ranges from 6.6 to 8.1 for the roadster. 250HP comes from
3.2 L engine (same displacement as Crossfire but apparently spec'd at
35 hp more). Cost = between $38 and $40k USD.
Z4 3.0i 0-60 = 5.9 seconds (228 hp)
Z4 2.5i 0-60 = 7.0 seconds (190 hp)
Z4 cost = between $40 and $45k.
HP = 138
MR2 weighs 1000 lbs less than Crossfire and retails for 1/2 the price.
192 hp, 0-60 = 7.0 seconds.
This car (4-cyl engine) _does_ actually appear to be a worse performer
than the Crossfire. Same weight (about 3100 lbs) but powered by a
4-banger. $40 USD.
Yes, there is quite a difference between the auto and standard isin't
there? Let's look at both, shall we?
Auto/manual hp: 197/238
Auto actually has more torque (164 vs 159) and peak comes at lower rpm
(5000 vs 5500). Curb weight very comparable to Crossfire (3050 lbs).
0-60 time for auto is hard to find. 0-60 time for standard is 5.9
seconds. Most people that buy an RX-8 will probably NOT get the
automatic anyways ...
Within 10 of a Porsche Boxster?
Boxter hp: 225
0-60: 6.4 seconds
cost: $43k USD
Boxter S hp: 258
0-60: 5.7 seconds
cost: $52 USD
Crossfire has 3.2L engine, 215 hp, 3060 lbs, 0-60 is 6.4 seconds (Road
& Track). Cost is about $34k USD.
Conclusion:
Crossfire is less expensive than comparable models (MR2 not really in
the same league). Crossfire does not stand out in performance but it
does have curb appeal and is a head-turner. It does have interior
issues with ergonomics and seating.
Big tires mean tire-slap when driving over expansion joints. Getting
into the car means climb over the relatively high sill, keep head down
to clear low roof, keep knee tucked in before bashing the bolster -
all at the same time. Tall people complain that it's uncomfortable
getting in and out, and that once in there isn't much space (if you're
claustrophobic you won't like this car). Big structural reinforcement
behind the seats limits seat travel even though there's plenty of room
behind it. Seat bottoms are too short and the steering wheel adjusts
for reach, not rake. Interior painted plastic is of questionable
taste. Blind spots are huge - the triangular rear window is almost
useless and the mirrors are way too small for serious driving. This
car is all about the styling, and probably the RX-8 comes closest in
terms of head-turning looks, price and performance.
