chip for 2005 300C Hemi?

Discussion in 'Chrysler 300' started by Ritz, Nov 18, 2004.

  1. Ritz

    Ritz Guest

    A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
    paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
    if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.

    If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
    chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.

    Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
    were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.

    Any info would be greatly appreciated.

    Cheers,
     
    Ritz, Nov 18, 2004
    #1
  2. Yeah, because the 300C Hemi is *so* lacking in performance from the
    factory.
    Your buddy is an idiot in need of a clue.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Nov 19, 2004
    #2
  3. Ritz

    Ritz Guest


    Thanks for the completely unhelpful response. A simple "no" would have
    sufficed.

    C
     
    Ritz, Nov 20, 2004
    #3
  4. What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
    carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
    lawn mowers.
     
    General Schvantzkoph, Nov 20, 2004
    #4
  5. Ritz

    Ritz Guest

    Actually, no. The term applies to engines that don't use forced
    induction (turbo or supercharging).

    Wow, 2 completely non-helpful responses. I'm on a roll.

    Cheers,

    C
     
    Ritz, Nov 20, 2004
    #5
  6. | General Schvantzkoph wrote:
    | > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:18:31 +0000, Ritz wrote:
    | >
    | >
    | >>A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
    | >>paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
    | >>if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.
    | >>
    | >>If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
    | >>chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
    | >>
    | >>Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
    | >>were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.
    | >
    | >
    | > What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
    | > carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
    | > lawn mowers.
    |
    | Actually, no. The term applies to engines that don't use forced
    | induction (turbo or supercharging).
    |
    | Wow, 2 completely non-helpful responses. I'm on a roll.
    |
    | Cheers,
    |
    | C

    My recommendation is to leave the car as it is. It's performance is top notch
    already and why mess with voiding the manufacturers warranty by doing
    unnecessary modifications?
     
    James C. Reeves, Nov 20, 2004
    #6
  7. Ritz

    Ritz Guest

    That's my advice too, but it's not my car. So I agreed to help my
    friend by asking some questions online. I drove it a couple of days ago
    for the first time and thought it was *plenty* fast.

    Cheers,

    C
     
    Ritz, Nov 20, 2004
    #7
  8. I prefer my "no"s to be fancy.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Nov 20, 2004
    #8
  9. No, "Normally aspirated" is a term that does not refer in any way to the
    fuel delivery system. It simply means there is no forced induction device
    (supercharger or turbocharger).
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Nov 20, 2004
    #9
  10. The most helpful thing you can do for your friend is to pass along --
    verbatim -- the responses you're (he's) getting.
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Nov 20, 2004
    #10
  11. Ritz

    Art Guest

    I would recommend that instead of trying to add power to the engine, he
    concentrates on reducing weight. Replace the tires with flat resistent ones
    and dump the spare tire. If he is the only one in the car, remove a few
    bolts and take out the extra seats. The door panels could also be removed
    and thereby exposing the window motors which are quite heavy. Glue the
    windows in place (that was standard feature on earyl 300M's) and remove the
    window motors and regulators. If he is really serious, the ac and radio has
    got to go.
     
    Art, Nov 20, 2004
    #11
  12. Ritz

    Rick Blaine Guest

    These guys make one for the Hemi Ram, it's just a matter of time before they
    show up for the 300c.

    http://www.jetchip.com/

    These cars do have great power, but more is always better. By the way
    you're better off googling than asking about power chips on Usenet as you
    can see by the helpful advice you've gotten so far.
     
    Rick Blaine, Nov 20, 2004
    #12
  13. No, actually your not better off.

    If you google all you get is the chip manufacturers sales literature which
    "proves" that if you drop $500 into their chip that your car will run like
    greased lighting with a 50% improvement, sip gas like it's the last tankful
    it will ever see, and quadruple the longtivity of your vehicle so that your
    grandchildren will still be driving it.

    If you ask here on Usenet where you will find people who DON'T have
    a vested interest in these chips, you will get the truth which is they do
    absolutely nothing that can be measured on a dyno, in return for emptying
    your wallet.

    The only time chipping a car does anything is if you have a turbocharger
    and the chip you put in allows you to increase boost past the computer's
    preprogrammed limit. Of course your turbo won't last longer than a
    $5 whore on the docks when the ships come in, but if you know how to
    increase boost in a turbo you probably know this too.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Nov 20, 2004
    #13
  14. Ritz

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I think you've sent a new record for the amount of missinformation in
    one post. The performance chips can make some improvement in normally
    aspirated vehicles, especially those with auto trannies. They can
    modify spark timing, fuel maps and shift points and this can all
    increase performance, but at the expense of something else, typically
    fuel economy.

    And increasing the boost in a turbocharged engine isn't much harder on
    the turbo, it is the engine internals that take most of the grief.

    I'll take your word on the whore, I have no experience there.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Nov 20, 2004
    #14
  15. Ritz

    mic canic Guest

    i have heard there is some stuff on the way the new n.g.c software is playing
    hell with the programers
     
    mic canic, Nov 20, 2004
    #15
  16. No they cannot, unless you buy performance chips that are 'off-road-only'
    ie: illegal to run on the street. And those will burn out your catalyatic
    converter. And even then, if you don't do the other things needed - like
    camming it, adding headers, etc. - you won't get the most out of an
    off-road chip.
    You cannot do any of that without making emissions exceed the legal
    limits, unless the modifications are so slight - just a few percent - that
    the rise in emissions is within the tolerance range, which on new vehicles
    is not that great. And there's too many other variables - such as the
    temperature that day, engine wear, etc. - which are going to matter more
    than a legal perf chip.
    Wrong again there. Most turbo engines use forged pistons and the
    like and can readily take the higher power. As long as your not an
    idiot and upgrade your fuel system so the engine doesen't go lean at
    the higher boost, the engine isn't the problem.

    The turbo is the problem because higher boost means higher turbo speed,
    which means operating the turbo above it's maximum speed, ie: overspinning.
    Sure, you can avoid a lot of trouble by using synthetic fuel, but the
    turbo still takes a beating.

    But that is generally not a problem for folks that increase boost and who
    know what they are doing, since they generally are planning on getting
    a bigger turbo anyway, they may as well burn out the stocker.

    These perf chip arguments have come up on this forum again and again.
    Every time they do, the chip proponents are challenged to take dyno
    results proving their street legal chipped cars are better with the chip
    than
    without, that is when they slink off and we never hear from them again.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Nov 21, 2004
    #16
  17. Ritz

    Rick Blaine Guest

    Thanks for your opinions. What evidence do you have that these chips do not
    work? Have you any dyno results? Personal experience? Or is it just
    arm-chair bullshit?
     
    Rick Blaine, Nov 22, 2004
    #17
  18. Thanks for your opinions as well.
    Nobody that has bought them has reported measurable increases in power
    for street-legal vehicles.

    Every time that someone has posted about chips claiming that they really
    sped up their vehicle, there has been a lot of attention, as you may well
    imagine. Everyone after all wants to believe that there's a magic bullet
    that only costs a few hundred bucks that will make a Yugo smoke it's
    tires. During the subsequent Q&A with the original poster it is discovered
    that the poster is either lying, (because they cannot answer specific
    questions from others who have the same vehicle, or they won't say
    where they got it tested), or the poster is relying on seat-of-the-pants
    and hasn't measured it on a dyno, or the poster is a racer and has
    chipped the vehicle with a chip that makes the vehicle illegal to drive it
    on the street. (usually right after that the OP claims to not live in an
    area that does emissions testing)

    So, yes, I'll give you this much: if you live in the boondocks and don't
    care
    if your emissions aren't legal, and are willing to risk sooting up your
    catcon
    with a rich mixture, then sure, go ahead and put an off-road chip in the
    vehicle. You will get a performance improvement - because one of the
    fundamental tradeoffs in internal combustion engine design is that a
    normally
    aspirated engine produces more power if run rich. ie: the ideal fuel/air
    mix for maximum power is richer than the ideal fuel/air mix for minimum
    emissions. Unfortunately, this mix is not friendly to catcons.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Nov 22, 2004
    #18
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.