'93 Grand Voyager ATF and rough shifts

Discussion in 'Voyager' started by SBlackfoot, Sep 13, 2007.

  1. SBlackfoot

    SBlackfoot Guest

    The easy part. Should I fill my tranny with ATF+4 or search for +3? It seems
    most of the local places only have +4 now. It's a '93 Grand Voyager 3.0L, 3
    speed auto (A670 I would imagine), 203k kms.

    The harder part. This tranny has always had hard upshifts, especially when
    cold. By hard I mean it bangs into gear with a good jolt even when very
    gentle on the gas. The first 1-2 and 2-3 upshift is usually very hard, and
    it usually shifts hard when between gears in stop and go traffic. It's
    usually a little less violent (sometimes downright smooth) if I stay on the
    gas a little, which is tough in traffic. Not a new problem, it has been
    doing this for years now. The previous owner (my late father) never
    considered it to be a problem but obviously something isn't right. It never
    EVER slips, it just bangs into gear. What are the odds that a simple band
    adjustment would help? Anything else I could check? Symptoms seem odd too me
    for a bad mount, what do you guys think?

    Now that I think about it, would running Dexron cause the rough shifts? I
    did a pan-change a while back with ATF+3 and it got a little better for a
    while, but that was by no means a complete change. If it had been filled
    with with the wrong fluid at some point before that... Whatcha think?
     
    SBlackfoot, Sep 13, 2007
    #1
  2. SBlackfoot

    kmath50 Guest

    ATF+3 was recommended even for the 3 speeds at the time this vehicle
    was assembled. ATF+3 has been made by Quaker State, and Valvoline if I
    remember correctly for some time, so it should not be hard to find.

    I would suggest taking your van to a competent transmission shop to
    determine that hard shift problem.

    -KM
     
    kmath50, Sep 13, 2007
    #2
  3. SBlackfoot

    SBlackfoot Guest

    ATF+3 was recommended even for the 3 speeds at the time this vehicle
    True, but ATF+4 was obviously not available at the time the vehicle was
    asssembled. I know it is recommended for most older model Chrysler trannies
    with some exceptions, including those in some (all?) of the minivans. Hence
    the question, should the A670 be filled with ATF+3 as spec'ed back in 1992-3
    or the modern ATF+4?
    Last resort. If the symptoms could be caused by something simple I'd rather
    investigate that first rather than risk getting hosed at a shop right off
    the bat.
     
    SBlackfoot, Sep 15, 2007
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.