600 mile range Federal law needed

Ever watch C-Span? It's been on several times this past week.

Stay with the times dude.

"Fox News" is nothing but lies straight from the liars telling the lies over
there in the White House.

 

Hi,
I think it would be great to have a 600 mile range on a gas tank. I
have been driving a Taurus for the last 3 years and the range for city
driving is only 200 miles. The Taurus is a good car but, the most annoying
thing about it is that I need to watch the "trick" gas guage so closely.
Full is about a quarter inch past F. Empty, is when the needle is around
the quarter mark. The needle on half means there are about 3 gallons left.
People have asked me if I am sure about this and I am because even though I
have never run out, I have seen the unmistakeable signs of being close to
running out including sputters and the like.
The issue with being able to calculate a 600 mile range though would be
that it would need to rely on accurate MPG figures which are not always the
case. MPGs vary based on terrain, weather and other factors.

 

So you actually listen to yourself?

Maybe if you'd pay more attention to what is going on in this country and
get off that Faux News, you'd learn a thing or two.

 

Again, you need to learn the facts. Bush NEVER won a federal election. Only
in the recounts that favored bush did he win. And those were so mucked up
just to get those figures. Not to mention the illegal purge of legally
registered voters. And yes, the machines were faulty. Still are. If they
were so accurate, then why is it the republikan party refuses to allow a
paper trail added to all of the machines used?

 

Sure, just tell me where the original post came from and where and when this
became cross posted?????????

 

I once had a fuel gage go out in my old Plymouth (not so) Reliant. I never
new how much gas I had but I always kept track of the mileage. I know the
way I drive a vehicle and I knew I could go so far before needing to fill
up. This went on for almost two years, spring, summer, autumn and winter, WI
to CA. Different conditions do mean different MPG but it can be compensated
for if one knows his vehicle.

I also think the original poster may have meant that a 600 MPG Rating would
have been under certain conditions. Look at any ad in a magazine where they
claim such and such MPG. There is always the disclaimer about conditions and
how you drive.

 

A little more originalty than some regurgitated Al Franken lines woudld be
better.

 

You're asking for 600 miles city driving? So you want a 33 gallon tank?
I don't think you would be happy with that, and when full, your milage
would drop dut to the weight.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

.... and like I said you think that the lunar landing was faked and that
Bush prayed Katrina into being and hitting New Orleans. Again - as long
as we have people like you speaking publicly on behalf of the libs, the
Democrat pary has an uphill battle. All we conservatives ask is that
you keep up the good work.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

So I was right. You won't answer specific questions because the truth
isn't what you want to hear, nor is it in you.

Specifically you will not address if SH had WMDs? How were thousands of
Kurds killed in Iraq? How many times did SH invade Kuwait? What did
Bill Clinton say about SH and what we should do about him? Was the UN
resoution unanymous? Did SH support terrorism by offering families of
suicide bombers rewards? Did SH support Al Quida?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

Actuall, you were wrong again.

I'll answer your questions. You may not like hearing the truth, but read on.

Absolutely not. At least not after he was forced to get rid of them after
daddy bush attacked in '91. Haven't you been listening to the truth? Hans
Blix said no before the war in started in '03 and all of the intelligence
reports since have said he did not have them. Haven't heard of the "Downing
Street Memo's" either have you. Proof your boy cooked the books to gain
support for his illegal oil grab.

With WMD supplied to him by Reagan/Bush/Rummsfeld. Again, those were no
longer in his possession in '03.

Once. And that was with the permission of the first bush administration.

He said the UN resolutions were working during his time in office and Saddam
wasn't threatening anybody except the British and US warplanes flying over
his soverign country on a daily basis.

It was unanymous that bush NOT attack Iraq.

I can't prove otherwise and neither can you. It has been reported to be so,
but then we were also told he had WMD which you know was proven fasle.

Did SH support Al Quida?

No. Saddam was and possibly still is a secular Muslim. Al Quaida is run by
the person who trully attacked this country four years ago, Osama been
Forgotten. Osama was not in cahoots with Sadam. In fact he hated Sadam
because of his secular views. To Osama, Sadam was an infedel for not
following Islam like Osama and his fundamentalists want.

 

I really don't care if the lunar landing was faked.

I don't think bush or any religious fanatic could pray any hurricane into
existence, much less where it's going to hit.

I only believe in facts. Not the idiotic ideas you have of us liberals.

 

Bill, are you a religious man? Are you a so-called christian?

If so, just how in the hell do you think you're going to get into heaven by
badmouthing liberals? Remember, jesus was the biggest liberal of them all.

 

Please not this tripe. You're probably one of those who claim Joseph and
Mary were homeless too when Jesus was born.

 

I love hearing the truth.

Per the UN, he was required to account for the weapons that were on the
books, and he never did.

But there were more WMD's than that.

Like I say - keep up the lunacy. Only makes us look good.

No - actually WJC said that Sadam needed to be removed from power.
Where have *you* been?

He said, making it up as he wnet along.

Yes - provable. Non-sequitur.

Re: WMD's - as I said, he was required by the UN to account for them and
couldn't. But you will deny that I'm sure, or thow in another non-sequitur.

Yes - provided training facilities and assylum. "Enemy of my enemy..."
kind of thing.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

You know nothing of true Christianity if you think not badmouthing
liberals will get you into heaven. Sorry - but that's not the criteria.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

 

only been hanging out in automotive-related newsgroups, huh? if you
consider his postings to be frothy, you have been extremely sheltered.

i won't speak to the issue of freedom of expression, but in regard to
virtually everything else -- the war in iraq, the economy, immigration,
irresponsible tax cuts and while ballooning the deficit, the pathetic
response to hurricane katrina, this administration is nothing short of
criminal. as the saying goes, "if you're not outraged, you're not paying
attention." i would consider it frivolous to take anybody by the hand and
lead them to the mountains of evidence regarding this administration's
blunders, lies and malfeasance. anybody who doesn't realize what's
happening is either wilfully blind or woefully stupid.

what was the question? i was simply responding to your apparent lack of
humor.

they can express themselves all they like; but it's been my experience that
rabid bush-backers are your typical "crash beer can on forehead, thump your
chest, kill em all and let my non-existent god sort it out" kinda guys.
they wear buffalo-check flannel sweaters, bad haircuts and have a vocabulary
somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 words. i consider it to be good form to
let them know that any bullying behavior on their part will be met with the
reduction of their head to a pulpy and bloody mass. they understand that.
other than that, they can express away.



Typcial libs. You want to

i'd do the same. i don't help the walking dead.

 

By your replies, you wouldn't know it if it jumped up and bit you in your
ass.

Yes, yes. Just as bush said. Tell me, how was Sadam supposed to prove he
didn't have what he didn't have? That is like saying, show me you have
something in your hand when you have nothing in your hand. It's all a play
on words to make Sadam look guilty to the imbeciles that follow bush's line
of thinking.

Where. Hiding in his underwear? Sadam had none. End of story.

I guess you're gonna try telling me Sadam invaded Kuwait 5000 times in the
last 100 years? You are insane.

Clinton never said that.

Go back and check your history. Don't you remember you fools putting down
the French because they voted against bush's war? So did the Germans, the
Russians and the Chineese. All members of the UN Security Council. Jeez. And
I thought you knew some facts.

Like I said. It's not provable.

As I said above, how was he supposed to prove the glass was empty when there
was nothing inside to show?

Bullshit. There were never any Al Quaida in Iraq before bush got his war
hardon and made a mess of everything getting 1896 American service men and
women killed because he lied. Even that Zarqauwi (spelling?) dude said that
he has just become a follower of Al Quaida, and that was after the war
started. Didn't Fox News tell you that? I guess not. They won't tell you the
truth if it makes their imbecile look bad.

 

Why would anyone really care???????????????

 

i agree. all this tripe about some comic book hero for adults floating
around the sky and giving a damn about a buncha bald primates is just plain
pathetic.