1999 T&C Minivan Rear Heater Core

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Bob Shuman, Oct 6, 2008.

  1. Bob Shuman

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Several months ago I replaced all of the rubber coolant/heater hoses on my
    1999 Town & Country Limited Minivan. Other than a few being a royal PITA, I
    thought it went fairly uneventfully. A day later, I noticed a small drip on
    my garage floor located just in front of the rear passenger side wheel. I
    suspect this is the rear heater core, and sure enough when I checked the
    hose was lightly damp, so I tightened the hose clamp a bit more, but the
    leak did not stop. The leak is fairly minor and I have been able to add
    about 8 oz of 50/50 mix every month to maintain the proper level on the
    coolant recovery tank.

    I now suspect that I could have possibly damaged the inlet tube fitting
    going into the core since I recall that I was surprised to see that the
    inlet tube actually pivoted in the horizontal plane when I replaced that
    short rubber connector hose.

    Has anyone replaced this hose or the rear heater core before and if so, can
    you confirm that the inlet tubes to the rear heater core are supposed to be
    soldered in place/stationary? Given the situation, will I need to replace
    the core and if so, how difficult is this job, or can I apply a
    simpler/cheaper fix (JB Weld, Epoxy, or have the inlet tube re-soldered)?

    Lastly, I've always used the standard green ethylene glycol (Prestone or
    Peak 2-year change interval) mix in this vehicle. Can I use Zerex G-5
    (5-year change interval) coolant in this vehicle like I do in my newer
    Chryslers? Doing so would allow me to avoid doing the time consuming flush
    and fill during the remaining expected ownership of this vehicle.

    Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Oct 6, 2008
    #1
  2. You should be able to see from the fluid trail if it's coming from
    within the passenger compartment or just at the hose joint.

    My recommendation is to disconnect the 2 hoses going to the rear
    heater and couple them together, bypassing the core. If the leak goes
    away then you know it's the core.

    If the core is leaking your best bet is replacing it I think. You can get
    a radiator shop to resolder the inlet tubes but their labor would cost what
    a new core would. I wouldn't recommend JB Weld on a joint that is
    in the passenger compartment, in order to properly apply it anyway your
    going to have to take the interior panel off to get at the heater core and
    by the time you get that far you might as well replace the core.
    Personally I think the 5 year change mix is snake oil and in another 10
    years when we see a lot of used cars with rotted-out cooling systems
    people will figure that one out. If your asking for advice on jury-rigging
    you may as well know that a simple dump and replace of the mix in the
    radiator will get about 1/2 of what is in there, and if you do that every
    2 years you will likely keep the anti-corrosion additive package adequately
    supplied. Lots and lots of people have gone for extended change intervals
    with the traditional green stuff mainly due to lackadasical maintainence
    and have suffered no ill effects.

    Flushing - if done properly (ie: backflushing) - gets rid of sediment
    that builds up. Just because you can make an anti-corrosion additive
    package last twice as long doesen't mean that sediment isn't still
    building up in the system at the same rate. There is always material
    loss from the materials (ie: hoses) as well as some oxidization - the
    cooling system isn't sealed - even though it may be happening at a
    lower rate - that all contributes material that settles out of the system
    into the nooks and crannies. I'm not convinced that the G-5 formulation
    reduces the rate that this happens at. Getting the chemical package to
    last longer is the easy part.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 7, 2008
    #2
  3. Bob Shuman

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Ted,

    Thanks much for your thoughts. By the way, I do realize I could completely
    bypass the heater core and eliminate the leak, but would like to retain the
    rear heater if possible since winters here in Chicago can be cold. From
    brief visual inspection, the leak seems to be coming from outside the
    passenger compartment, but as you suggest it will likely need to be opened
    up to confirm that. If I go to that trouble, then I may just elect to
    replace the heater core completely since it is now going on 10 years old.
    If anyone has replaced the rear heater core and can provide advice/comments
    on difficulty of that job, it also would be appreciated.

    On the G-05, I've been operating thus far on a 4-year and roughly 40K mile
    cycle on my other vehicles and have not had any problems yet, so that is why
    I asked. For the record, I do the complete Prestone chemical flush (drain
    coolant, fill with tap water, add chemical, bring to operating temperature,
    then drain), then backflush afterward with a garden hose, then refill with
    tap water and bring back up to operating temperature twice to rinse the
    chemical, before refilling. The real issue here is time for the vehicle to
    cool down between each of these fills/drains, so as you can see it takes
    considerable time. Since I do this now with the 2-year stuff too, I was
    looking to save half my labor by going to the 4-year cycle with G-05.

    To clarify my original question, I want to know if anyone is aware of
    anything in the chemical composition of the Zerex G-05 that is incompatible
    with the 1999 3.8L engine design (water pump, block, heads, TStat, hoses,
    radiator, heater cores, etc.) since the owner's manual specifies the use of
    green, 2-year ethylene glycol. Again, thanks for taking time to reply with
    your thoughts and suggestions.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Oct 7, 2008
    #3
  4. Bob Shuman

    kenwalker1 Guest

    Hi Bob if you don't really want to replace the core you can try K&W
    block sealer,I am a mechanic that has worked for used car lots for too
    many years but this stuff will work better than anything I have tried.
    You will need to drain the cooling system and flush with water and
    just follow directions on the can. You might have to look around to
    find it or "google it" I hope this will help. Ken
     
    kenwalker1, Oct 8, 2008
    #4
  5. Bob Shuman

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Ken,

    Thanks for the thought, but I am extremely reluctant to use any type of
    cooling system sealer/additive. My thinking here is that anything intended
    to plug small leaks could only serve to reduce cooling by clogging the same
    radiator vanes and engine block/head passages that I have worked hard over
    the years to keep flushed and clear.

    Bob

    Hi Bob if you don't really want to replace the core you can try K&W
    block sealer,I am a mechanic that has worked for used car lots for too
    many years but this stuff will work better than anything I have tried.
    You will need to drain the cooling system and flush with water and
    just follow directions on the can. You might have to look around to
    find it or "google it" I hope this will help. Ken
     
    Bob Shuman, Oct 9, 2008
    #5
  6. It should be a lot easier to replace the rear heater core than the front and
    I wouldn't hesitate.
    I have had the panels in my van off - it's a different year than yours. You
    really
    want the factory service manual to know where all the hidden screws are.
    Alternatively, visit a local pick-a-part wrecking yard and go inspect the
    same
    year van as yours that has already been torn apart.
    You don't need to chemical flush if your regularly changing the coolant.

    I have mixed feelings on the flush chemicals. The one time I went to the
    trouble to do it I ended up with a block worse off than before. (It hadn't
    had a coolant change in at least 10 years) My feeling on it is that if your
    regularly maintaining antifreeze then you don't need it, and if you do need
    it then likely your going to create a large slough-off of sediment all at
    once
    which will plug block metering passages.
    The original rule of thumb was that any American vehicle with an older
    copper/brass radiator and heater core, soldered together,
    should use old-style green ethlyne glycol for greatest protection against
    material loss
    on the solder. Original HOAT coolants (ie: Zerex G-05) did have some
    additives that protect copper and tin/lead solder, but not as much as the
    green
    stuff contained.

    Use of Dexcool in these cars is known to plug heater cores, both Ford and
    Chrysler
    had a lot of problems with this when Dexcool (OAT) came out as OAT
    coolants rapidly corrode the solder. Dexcool in particular is known to turn
    corrosive in the presense of air, and is known to be damaging to many
    rubber seal materials - it should NEVER be used in a car that didn't have
    it as factory fill.

    The story going around is that GM got environmental credits from the Feds
    for using OAT coolants, and so they didn't give a rat's-ass about what
    everyone else was using or how bad their own crappy coolant would be
    in other manufacturer's cars.

    Older Japanese cars are also known to be safe with green coolant, regardless
    of
    what their factory fill was.

    However, these days the original HOAT coolants have been
    reformulated with proprietary trade-secret chemicals to produce the newer
    "universal style" HOAT. In other words, the Zerex G-05 coolant of 6 years
    ago is not the same chemical as the Zerex G-05 of today that is marked
    "Universal" There simply isn't enough ancedotal evidence that today's
    Universal
    HOAT (G-05 or equivalent) is bad in older cars because these haven't
    been on the market long enough. So in answer to your question - nobody
    really knows. Zerex almost certainly will tell you that their Universal
    G-05 will be safe. But how long has it been on the market in it's current
    formulation?

    Green coolant is held by many to be damaging to plastic radiators.

    Green coolant is also more corrosive to aluminum radiator and heater
    cores and to aluminum engine parts.

    However, like the Universal HOAT, there's now Universal green stuff
    on the market that has -also- been reformulated with trade-secret
    chemicals that are not supposed to be as corrosive to aluminum as
    before.

    Newer American and Japanese cars use aluminum radiators and heater cores.
    They
    are safe for HOAT coolants (ie: Zerex G-O5) as a general rule.

    There are a variety of European and Japanese coolants
    that are factory fill in their respective models (ie: BMW uses a blue
    coolant) these
    should NEVER be used in any models other than what they shipped in. The
    Japanese
    cars that these coolants come in are as a general rule safe for HOAT
    coolants. Not
    so for the European cars, which may or may not be, depending on the model.
    Worse
    from the European side is that there have been a number of changes from year
    to
    year in the proprietary cooants, making some not even compatible with each
    other
    for topping off.

    As a general rule, only HOAT and original green are safe in a 50/50 mix
    with hard tap water. None of the specialty Japanese and European
    coolants OR the OAT coolants should be mixed with anything other than
    distilled water.

    Different coolant types should NEVER be mixed. You must completely
    flush to switch from, for example, specialty Japanese to G-05, or from green
    to HOAT.


    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 9, 2008
    #6
  7. Bob Shuman

    Bill Putney Guest

    Ted,
    I'm a big proponent of HOAT/G-05. Where did you learn that HOAT has
    been reformulated? Can you provide links to any articles?

    Also I have not seen any Zerex references to it being universal - that
    doesn't mean there aren't any - I just haven't seen any. On this page of
    their site: http://www.valvoline.com/zerex/automaker.asp
    they say "There is no 'one size fits all' chemistry that is approved for
    use in all vehicles. Don't take chances—use Zerex AutoMaker Approved
    Chemistry" - that's above the pictures of their 3 antifreeze products -
    traditional green, G-05 and DexCool™. And on this page:
    http://www.valvoline.com/pages/products/product_detail.asp?product=10
    I don't see any suggestion of universal use, though I did put it in my
    wife's '99 Buick about 3 years ago with no ill effects so far.

    On this page:
    http://www.valvoline.com/carcare/articleviewer.asp?pg=vcc20051101ac&cccid=2&scccid=1

    "Perhaps one of the most important aspects to look for when next
    shopping for antifreeze/coolant is approval from the maker of your car.
    Currently, there is no 'one size fits all' solution that is approved for
    use in newer cars. And filling your cooling system with the wrong
    solution may result in serious adverse effects.

    "Products marked APPROVED have been subjected to years of field and lab
    testing by your car's manufacturer and are certain to provide the best
    performance and protection. Also, use of these products will ensure your
    car's warranty remains intact. The same cannot be said for using
    non-approved products, which may end up causing more problems than they
    solve. Some quality antifreeze/coolant producers even print the makes
    that have approved their products for use. This is always the best way
    to go."
     
    Bill Putney, Oct 9, 2008
    #7
  8. Bob Shuman

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Ted,

    As always, you are a wealth of information. Thanks. Based on your
    response, you appear to be suggesting that I replace the rear core (thanks
    for the idea of visiting a salvage yard to "learn") and then stick with the
    green or go to the universal green stuff and just reduce my flush interval
    to reduce labor/time for the operation. I can accept that as an alternative
    I had not considered.

    I will comment though on your line that HOAT coolant should never be mixed
    with tap water. This is pretty much an impossible requirement if you use
    tap to back flush, since you can NEVER get all of this out before you refill
    with coolant and distilled (like I do). I actually do my last rinse after
    flushing with distilled to improve the mix percentage of distilled, but this
    is still not perfect.

    Also, I will say that even when I chemically flush and then back flush every
    two years, I get a good deal of brackish, brown water out of the system
    before it runs clear again. I assume this is normal, but this is why I have
    done it regularly at 2 year intervals. I can see the value with my own
    eyes.

    Lastly, I'll add that I've heard and read so much negative press on DexCool
    that I have never ever consider using it.

    Thanks again. Now for some good weather and a weekend to take this on.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Oct 9, 2008
    #8
  9. Do you have an air compressor? You can get a cheap one from
    Harbor Freight for $80. When I flush my van, after rinsing with
    tap water I use an air blow gun and flush with compressed air. THAT
    does get most everything out.

    Fortunately where I live we have extremely soft water - so soft, in
    fact that the water bureau has to put a chemical in it to harden it up
    a bit - otherwise it leaches an unacceptably high amount of lead out
    of copper sweat joints and brass fixtures.
    If your seeing brown water in the initial flush BEFORE you are putting
    the chemical flush in, then I would consider that abnormal. I've not seen
    brown water out of any cooling system in any of the cars I've owned when I
    flushed
    them unless the cooling system had been neglected. I use green stuff with
    tap water, my vehicles are not as new as yours.
    It's standard-issue for GM. Of course, GM also has the battery terminals on
    the side too. I guess they just like being different.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 11, 2008
    #9
  10. Bob Shuman

    Bob Shuman Guest

    Ted,

    Yes, I have a compressor. I never thought of using it for this purpose
    though. I guess that you must remove one of the heater hoses and attach it
    there to get that to drain out. I'll give it a try next time around.
    Thanks again for the ideas.

    By the way, the rear leak turned out to be a bad connector hose. No matter
    how tight I tried to tighten the hose clamp, it never stopped the slight
    drip, so I cut new 5/8" heater hoses and made them slightly longer this time
    around, then just replaced them and re-used the same 4 hose clamps. For
    now, anyway, the dripping has stopped. The good news is that the heater
    core and the quick connections to it look fine ... the leak was on the other
    side of the hose connection.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Oct 12, 2008
    #10
  11. Bob Shuman

    Bill Putney Guest

    Yo - Ted - you there?

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Oct 12, 2008
    #11
  12. Yes, this news server I'm using isn't always, though.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Oct 13, 2008
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.