Engine Oil/Additives for high mileage 3.0

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by jmcgill, Nov 29, 2005.

  1. jmcgill

    User Guest

    But there is absolutely no foundation for your "precaution about
    suddenly switching over on a high mileage engine". You claim there
    are many posts from people reporting major problems after such a
    switch, but you refuse to provide any examples.

    There aren't any examples. There's absolutely no reason "suddenly
    switching over to synthetic" in a high-mileage engine would cause any
    problems. So please stop perpetuating this myth.
     
    User, Dec 8, 2005
    #81
  2. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    Yes - and I explained why.
    Matt disagrees with you, but you ignore that too.
    You can't make me.

    People can make up their own minds.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 8, 2005
    #82
  3. jmcgill

    jzavacky Guest

    For this engine in particular, I recommend Sakrete, available in 80lb
    bags at your nearest home improvement store.



    (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
     
    jzavacky, Dec 9, 2005
    #83
  4. jmcgill

    User Guest

    Recall:
    :::"Sure - but I'm willing for you to think me a liar rather
    :::than go to the trouble. Knock yourself out"

    ROTFL!!! Quite the explanation!
    Nope. Matt found some examples where people complained about oil
    leaks. You are claiming "many posts" from people reporting major
    engine damage due to synthetic shaking loose deposits in high-mileage
    engines. No such posts exist.
    And it looks like you've already made up *your* mind, despite the lack
    of evidence. That's called 'faith', not 'science'.
     
    User, Dec 10, 2005
    #84
  5. jmcgill

    Bill Putney Guest

    Glad I could brighten your day.
    No - *you* don't see any, so therefore (in your mind) none exist. Funny
    how, below, you talk about working on faith - seems to be where you are
    coming from. Perhaps you would respond that you are also coming from
    personal experience. Well guess what, oh passionate one - so am I
    (which you dishonestly continue to ignore).
    That's where your continuing dishonesty comes in. I have made up my
    mind on what I have personally experienced and what I have read (you
    want to focus on one and not the other). So I'm working on faith
    according to you - so where's *your* science (and - no - I don't accept
    "Synthetics are very much the same except if we're talking about things
    that I can use to claim that they are superior - then they're *way*
    different - other than that, they are the same").

    Bottom line is that I could find the posts - it would take some time
    that I'm not willing to spend. That combined with the fact that,
    presented with posts saying precisely what I said, you would dismiss
    them anyway because it would go against your faith. You can't prove
    your point - I can't prove mine, which is why, right off the bat, I
    brought up a controlled study, which neither of us is going to do.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Dec 10, 2005
    #85
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.