98 Voyager Service engine lamp on but no codes?

Discussion in 'Voyager' started by Carl Byrns, Sep 5, 2004.

  1. Carl Byrns

    Carl Byrns Guest

    Hi-
    The Service engine lamp on our 98 Grand Voyager came on and I had the
    computer scanned at the local parts store. The OBDII tester says
    nothing is wrong, but the light is lit and apparently because there
    are no codes, OBDII won't allow a lamp reset.
    Anyone ever run in to this?

    Thanks- Carl
     
    Carl Byrns, Sep 5, 2004
    #1
  2. Carl Byrns

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I'd say take it to a dealer or qualified repair shop that knows what
    they are doing and has the right equipment to diagnose your problem The
    MIL lamp doesn't come on for no reason.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Sep 5, 2004
    #2
  3. Carl Byrns

    Carl Byrns Guest

    You would think so, but the OBDII tester shows that the processor
    believes the light is "off"- in other words, as far as the processor
    is concerned, there is 'no reason' for the light to be "on".

    -Carl
     
    Carl Byrns, Sep 6, 2004
    #3
  4. Carl Byrns

    jdoe Guest

    It may not be a good enough unit. Also there are "driveline specific" codes
    that only an DRB from mopar can pick up or a snap on unit. Take it in to a
    qualified tech with a mopar scanner.
    Larry
     
    jdoe, Sep 6, 2004
    #4
  5. Carl Byrns

    PC Medic Guest

    By any chance did this vehicle just pass the 60,000 mile mark?
     
    PC Medic, Sep 6, 2004
    #5
  6. Carl Byrns

    Matt Whiting Guest

    Then it appears that one of two things is wrong:
    1. The right tester isn't being used or it is being used incorrectly.
    2. The computer itself is bad and may have a failed output.

    I'm pretty sure my 96 Voyager has problem number two on the pin that
    controls the rear washer. The washer came on and stayed on. I had to
    unhook the pump to kill it. The dealer couldn't find the problem and
    was blaming a short in the wiring. Well, I unplugged the big connector
    to the BCM that holds the pin for the rear washer and then it stopped
    pumping. The pump is activated by switching the ground lead as the
    pump(s) are powered directly from the power distribution center. It
    appears that the output has either failed with a short to ground
    internally, or the software otherwise things the pump is being commanded
    to be on. Since the HVAC switch panel talks to the computer via a bus
    rather than discrete signals, I didn't have the equipment to
    troubleshoot it any further. However, unplugging the HVAC/wiper
    controls didn't have any affect on the status of the output pin on the
    BCM so I'm fairly confident that the issue isn't bogus commands from the
    washer switch switch.

    It could be that you have the same problem.


    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Sep 6, 2004
    #6
  7. Carl Byrns

    mic canic Guest

    there is the trans controller. which can turn on the lite and some scan
    tools the (cheaper one's)can't access the codes take it in before it's
    too late
     
    mic canic, Sep 6, 2004
    #7
  8. Carl Byrns

    mic canic Guest

    well thats the problem the ns van is a obd3 emission configuration
     
    mic canic, Sep 6, 2004
    #8
  9. Carl Byrns

    Carl Byrns Guest

    About 53000 miles ago <g>.

    -Carl
     
    Carl Byrns, Sep 6, 2004
    #9
  10. Carl Byrns

    Carl Byrns Guest

    That makes more sense than the "it's a cheap tester" theory (But, I'm
    going to take it over to my friend's garage and see what his
    megadollar scan tool says). I was always under the impression that
    OBDII was developed to eliminate the need for manufacturer-specific
    scan tools. The transmission shifts just fine and all the accessories
    work but the van has 100K plus Central New York miles on it, so there
    is a good chance that I'm looking at a corrosion or loose plug
    problem.

    -Carl
     
    Carl Byrns, Sep 6, 2004
    #10
  11. No, not at all. OBDII was developed with the idea to make the car computer
    smart enough so that it can self-diagnose the emissions control systems, so
    that inspection stations can plug in a tester that talks to any car computer
    and
    decides if the car is a polluter or not. It was also thought a good idea to
    define
    many of the codes common to all vehicles.

    But the manufacturers can and do add codes that are far in advance of the
    stuff that ODB defines.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Sep 7, 2004
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.